BBC still silent on Jay Cheshire case, even after a second tragic death from the false rape allegation

In October 2015 we reported on the tragic case of Jay Cheshire, a 17-year-old boy from Southampton who took his own life after being falsely accused of rape, a case reported by every major news organisation in the UK other than the BBC (and Guardian). On Friday 29th July, reports of the suicide of Jay’s mother Karin made the headlines, with some newspapers running multiple articles about the case over the weekend.

Karin Cheshire search

Jay’s tragic death and the disgraceful refusal of the BBC to carry out its obligation to report the story to licence fee payers inspired a number of articles on this blog. These included a full investigation of all media reported false rape claims resulting in the victim’s suicide.  This study showed the BBC (and Guardian) were the only outlets to have never reported or acknowledged the existence of a single such case in their entire histories.

At HEqual we assumed that this latest death would at least finally force the BBC to end its censorship of such major news stories. The Cheshire case was clearly highly notable last year and these latest developments eliminate even the slightest possible excuse for ignoring the story.

Amazingly, there’s still absolutely no trace of the story on any BBC website, tv programme or social media account, not even a retweet of a story by a different outlet. Unfortunately for the BBC, licence fee payers have actually noticed their complete lack of ethics this time around. Our nine month old article about their bias in ignoring the case received some 20,000 views in just 24 hours, hit the top 50 submission on Reddit and was even listed by Google news for a while. The expose now dominates regular Google searches for the subject and the public’s intrigue at the BBC’s misandry has now reached such a level whereby Google now instantly auto-suggests “BBC” after typing “Jay Cheshire”.

Jay Cheshire Google autocomplete

Last time around, we produced a list of ten trivial stories that BBC South had chosen to report in preference to Jay’s case. These included the capture of an escaped bird and the unveiling of a spoon statue. Regrettably, we’re forced to do the same thing again this time around. All the following were reported between Friday and Sunday by BBC South in preference to the Cheshire case:

  1. The closure of a shop
  2. A cat being shot with an air gun (and surviving)
  3. Delays in the refurbishment of a former court building
  4. A house fire caused by a faulty tumble dryer
  5. A bus driver helping a lady cross the road
  6. The opening of a tennis court
  7. The reinstatement of a bus service
  8. A student in a wheelchair who stood up to receive his degree
  9. Alleged cheating during a pigeon race
  10. 1,500 books put in a line in a park

Unlike the BBC, we try to be fair in our reporting, and in the hundreds of comments written over the weekend, some have suggested that perhaps the BBC simply has a policy of never reporting suicide cases in case it encourages more people to take their own lives.

As we showed last year, the BBC’s near obsessive coverage of the suicide of alleged false rape accuser Eleanor De Freitas at the exact same time as the Cheshire case blows this suggestion out of the water. Furthermore, none of the BBC members of staff we’ve contacted  ever suggested the existence of any policy banning reports of suicides. However, we decide to do further checks and found no shortage of BBC reports on the suicide of males around Jay’s age, most of them less newsworthy than Jay’s case:

The above reports on suicides were connected to bullying rather than any criminal act. Furthermore, all such articles were even written before any coroner’s inquests were concluded, suggesting the BBC actually jumped the gun in reporting the cases:

In addition to their 42 articles about the suicide of a false rape accuser,  the BBC does of course report on the suicide of rape victims, even before the release of a coroner’s report. This article for example, even mentions the concern a rape victim had of seeing her rapist at university, suggesting “In any other organisation… a person would be suspended”. Of course it’s likely that Jay faced the very same issue.

Last year’s outright refusal of the BBC to report the Cheshire case nationally was accompanied by excuses from their local BBC South team that they’d somehow been unaware of the story, this despite it making national headlines and clearly being the biggest story of the week in their region. They argued that they had been “playing catch-up”, presumably due to relying on the Guardian as their sole news source. Anyway, BBC South claimed to have since contacted Jay’s mother and would have been willing to cover the story on the condition that she did an interview. So, the BBC would apparently  only cover the news if they were able to get an exclusive video interview from a person clearly in no state to be doing any such thing, a woman who became so depressed as a result of he case she spent six months in hospital and then finally took her own life.

Quite rightly, it seems Karin Cheshire didn’t respond to the BBC, afterall, even tabloids reported the case without demanding exclusives. Furthermore, Karin’s tragic death now casts further doubt on the BBC’s honesty. We sent the story directly to those who refused to cover it or claimed to have missed it last time around and told them in no uncertain terms that our communications now eliminated the possibility of them trying this same excuse again. We’ve also challenged the BBC to cover the case multiple times on Twitter and their failure to do so yet again suggests they simply do not wish to touch the case under any circumstances and will use any excuse possible to avoid doing so.

We do hope in the future to report the historic day that the BBC finally does its job and becomes one of the last UK media outlets to finally acknowledge the existence of suicides caused by false rape allegations. Right now, the BBC simply continues to pretend that such cases do not exist but at least everyone now knows of their contempt for victims. of these crimes.

 

 

9 thoughts on “BBC still silent on Jay Cheshire case, even after a second tragic death from the false rape allegation

    • I have to commend HEQUAL for this work. The BBC is funded by our taxes and supposed to be above the biases that are clear from other media outlets. They simply should not be funded.

  1. The bbc has been taken over by the femarxist for years now – everyone knows that – and the Grauniad has been known as the bbc’s ‘house journal’ since at least the ’70s.
    Witness how many Corporation job adverts appear in it.

  2. Pingback: BBC still silent on Jay Cheshire case, even after a second tragic death from the false rape allegation | Justice for Men & Boys

  3. Pingback: BBC refused to report on double suicide case caused by false allegation | holocaust21

  4. Disturbing. Yet if you want to see the UK’s biggest false accuser then you had best look at Jim Gamble who lead the “Operation Ore” police investigation that started nearly two decades ago and culminated in at least 33 suicides (according to wikipedia, though I suspect more). Thousands of men were dragged through the courts for allegedly paying for child porn based on nothing than a bunch of credit card transactions, most of which are believed to have been fraudulent (which makes the men innocent). There was even due to be a big class action, however, the court decided they didn’t want to hear the bulk of the evidence and threw out the case (yes, really!).

    Disturbingly much like the Jay Cheshire case the BBC covered it up. As did the rest of the mainstream media. And Jim Gamble is still yet to spend a single day in prison for all the suicides he caused.

  5. Following on from the BBC’s quite obvious anti-male and pro-female agenda, here’s an article from – surprise surprise – Nottingham where, as already shown on this site, BBC journalism and coverage of gender issues is among the worst in the country. The professional victims of the BBC, rather than acknowledge the criticism, has forced misogyny to be recorded as a hate crime as yet another way of trying to make their sexism somehow valid and any critique of it ‘harassment’. DARVO mentality at its finest.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-36943676

    It is, to any rational and reasonable man or woman, completely unfair to protect one gender from hate crime and not the other. Had it been a blanket law for all sexist abuse then it would be fine, still likely biased in application but with supposedly full coverage. By making it purely about one gender they are directly stating that only one gender is worthy of legal protection from sexism.

    The woman who set it up has received threats, which should be condemned, but as is usually the case she and the BBC have used these extreme examples as the status quo, when most of the backlash has been completely fair. The woman in question says misogyny has become ‘acceptable’ when she knows damn well this isn’t the case, if it was acceptable then she and other gender victims wouldn’t be able to keep getting their way and ruining people’s lives by calling them misogynists, and her behaviour would need to change to suit society’s attitude, which clearly will never happen. This in itself disproves her tgeiry yet the BBC take her word as gospel.

    I believe it is time for this site to set up a petition, both on the government petition site and change.org, to demand that misandry become recorded as a hate crime. I’d set it up myself, but I am both too terrified of the consequences given the liberati and feminazi record of hounding anyone who challenges any aspect of their beliefs or actions, and I would have no idea how to promote such a thing anyway. It would have much more gravitas coming from here, and hopefully backed up by the Biased BBC site, Guido Fawkes etc, circulated to J4MB and Fathers 4 Justice and Mankind, and made aware to the media outlets that don’t treat men as second class citizens.

    Make it happen. The time is now.

    • Interesting that the most severe “macheté” Tweet she’s alleged to have received is notable by its absence. One might almost be tempted to think that she either made that one up or that it was a “false flag,” sent by a fellow feminist. If someone threatened to bury a blade in MY head on social media, I’d be sure to take a screengrab of it and forward it to the police.

  6. Pingback: One year on, BBC finally forced to acknowledge suicide of victim of false rape allegations | hequal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s